Soleimani, F., Karami, P., Safaian, N. (2013). Selection of Appropriate Estimation Methods of Range Conditions (Case Study: Kabirkooh Rangelands of Zagros, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 4(2), 101-109.
Freidoon Soleimani; Parviz Karami; Nosrat Safaian. "Selection of Appropriate Estimation Methods of Range Conditions (Case Study: Kabirkooh Rangelands of Zagros, Iran)". Journal of Rangeland Science, 4, 2, 2013, 101-109.
Soleimani, F., Karami, P., Safaian, N. (2013). 'Selection of Appropriate Estimation Methods of Range Conditions (Case Study: Kabirkooh Rangelands of Zagros, Iran)', Journal of Rangeland Science, 4(2), pp. 101-109.
Soleimani, F., Karami, P., Safaian, N. Selection of Appropriate Estimation Methods of Range Conditions (Case Study: Kabirkooh Rangelands of Zagros, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 2013; 4(2): 101-109.
Selection of Appropriate Estimation Methods of Range Conditions (Case Study: Kabirkooh Rangelands of Zagros, Iran)
1Researcher at Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Ahwaz
2University of Sanandaj
3University of Sari
Abstract
The range conditions explain its health as a management tool. Obviously, the implementation of this important assessment requires the most appropriate study method for each region. In order to select the most appropriate methods of range conditions in Kabirkooh grasslands of Zagros in Iran, five estimation methods (i.e. six-factor, fourfactor, vegetation and soil combination, value of pasture and climax) were studied in three key and critical areas. In each area, five stations were selected using the randomizedsystematic method. The differences between methods were analyzed using the factorial experiment by the help of the randomized complete blocks design with five replications. The results showed that there were significant differences (p<0.01) between both range conditions’ determination methods and different areas. Regarding Kabirkooh rangelands in current circumstances, four-factor method for semi-arid region is more applicable for the range condition determination. Biomass production and range conditions had a close relationship using Pearson correlation test (p<0.01, r=0.86).
Akbarzadeh, M., Moghadam, M. R., Jalili, A., Jafari, M., Arzani, H., 2007. Vegetation dynamic study of Kuhrang exclosure. Iranian Jour. Range and Desert Research, 13(4): 324-336. (In Persian).
Barani, H., 1996. Investigation and comparison of some common methods for assessing range condition appropriate with habitat potential in several climates of Tehran Province. M.Sc. thesis in range management. Tehran University. 60p. (In Persian).
Cox, G. W., 2002. General ecology: laboratory manual. Mc Graw- Hill Pub. USA.
Frost, W. E. and Smith, E. L., 1991. Biomass productivity and range condition on range sites in southern Arizona, Jour. Range Management. 44: 64-67.
Goebel, C. J., and Cook, C. W., 1960. Effect of range condition on plant vigor production and nutritive value of forage, Jour. Range Management. 13: 307-313.
Gorgin Karaji, M., 2004. Sustainable utilization management strategies based on ecological principles in Ferula lands of Kurdistan. M.Sc. Thesis in Range Management. Mazandaran University. (In Persian).
Krebs, C. J., 1999. Ecological methodology. Second addition Wesley Longman, Menlo park California, USA.
Mesdaghi, M., 2008. Range management in Iran. 5th Edition. Publications of Imam Reza University, Mashahd, Iran 333p. (In Persian).
Moghadam, M. R., 1994. Rangeland assessment. Booklet of natural resources faculty. Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
Moghadam, M. R., 1998. Range and range management. Publication of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran 470p. (In Persian).
Parsab consultant engineering, 1999. Detention-justifiable studies of watershed management for Abdanan urban basin. Climatology report. (In Persian).
Pendelton, D. T., 1989. Range condition as used in the soil conservation service. PP: 17-34. In: secondary succession and the evaluation of rangeland condition. W.K. Lauenroth, W. A. Laycock, eds. Boulder, Colo: Westview press.
Sabetpour, T., 2003. Relationship between range condition and range capacity of Javaherdeh summer rangeland. M.Sc. thesis in range management. Tarbiat Modarres University. (In Persian).
Safaeian, N. and Shokri, M., 2003. A new approach to determine condition and capacity of rangelands for northern Iran. Jour. Natural Resources., 55(2): 597-606. (In Persian).
Sheidaei, G., 1994. Conservation, development and utilization of the pastures, an overview of the history and methods of grazing in arid and semi-arid region. Jour. Forest and Rangeland. 24: 38-43. (In Persian).
Stoddart, L. A., Smith, A. D. and Box, T. W., 1975. Range Management. 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill. New York, USA.
Tamartash., R., 2012. Evaluation of Rangeland Condition based on Plant indices in Summer Rangelands of Lasem, Haraz. Iranian Jour. Range and Desert Research, 19 (2): 221-232. (In Persian).
Tiedman, J. A. and Beck, R., 1991. Dependence of standing crop on range condition rating in New Mexico, Jour. Range Management. 44(6): 602-605.
Top
