Preference Value Evaluation of Rangeland Plant Species for Kaboudeh Sheep

Document Type: Research and Full Length Article

Authors

1 Department of Rangeland Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

2 Department of Rangeland Management, Tehran University, Tehran,

3 Department of Rangeland Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran,

Abstract

Study on the livestock diet is one of the main priorities in the management of rangeland in Iran. So, this study was conducted to compare preference values of plant species in three age classes of Kaboudeh sheep (one, three and five year old ones) in rangelands of Bavanat, Fars province, Iran. For each age class, four sheep were selected and their grazing times from different plant species were recorded using a timing method (chronometer) for two hours during the day. The effects of livestock age, plant species and their interactions on preference values of plant species were assessed using a factorial experiment (GLM test). Also, one way ANOVA was applied to compare preference values between plant species for each age class of animals. The results showed that the age of the animals and plant species had significant effects on preference values of plant species. Species of Poa pratensis and Avena fatua for young animals and Acer cinerascens for older animals had higher preference values. In addition, species of Poa pratensis and Prangos ferulaceae had appropriate preference values for all three age classes of animals. As vegetation cover in the study area is mostly consisted of the bushes and shrubs in autumn and on the other hand, sheep has little ability to graze this kind of plant species subsequently during the grazing period, they dominantly focus on herbal species. In general, animal diet demands cannot be provided from rangelands and it is required to use the methods of manual feeding with dry forage and supplements. One of the possible alternatives is to harvest and store the annual yield of P. ferulaceae in spring in order to feed the animals in autumn and winter.

Keywords

References

Ahmadi, A., Sanadgol, A. A., Mohseni Saravi M., Arzani, H. and Zahedi Amiri, GH., 2009. Investigation of behavior and diet selection of different ages of Zandi sheep. Rangeland, 3(2): 232-245. (In Persian).

Alikhah Asl, M., Azarnivand, H., Arzani, H., Jaafari, M. and Zare Chahoki, M. A., 2009. Palatability relationship with the weight ratio of leaves and stems at different phonological stages. Rangeland, 3(2): 246-258. (In Persian).

Arzani, H., 2009. Forage quality. Tehran University Press. Tehran. 354pp. (In Persian).

Ashrafzadeh, M., Erfanzadeh R. and Hosseini Kahnuj, S. H., 2012. Effect of plant phonological stages on preference value of Baluchi camel in Zarrin Dasht rangeland. Rangeland, 6(1): 18-25. (In Persian)

Ashrafzadeh, M., Hossaini Kahnuj, S. H. and Azarnivand, H., 2014. Studying of livestock diet goats of Mamasani breed in summer rangelands of Bavanat city. Rangeland, in press. (In Persian).

Askarizadeh, D. and Heshmati, Gh. A., 2010. Diet selection by sheep and goats on upland rangelands (North Alborz), (Case study: Javaherdeh rangeland of Ramsar). Jour. Rangeland Science, 1: 285-293. (In Persian).

Baghestani Meybodi, N. and Arzani, H., 2004. Palatability of the species range, and why the behavior of goats in the rangelands of Yazd. Natural Resource, 58(4): 909-919. (In Persian).

Cox, G. W., 2002. General ecology: laboratory manual. McGraw-Hill pub. USA.

Dianati, Tilaki, Gh. and Mir Jalili, A., 2007. Investigation on palatability of rangeland plants in Yazd region. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 76: 69-73. (In Persian).

Ghanbari, A. and Sahraei, M., 2012. Determination of nutritional value in three forage species in three phonological stages in Sabalan rangelands, Ardebil, Iran. Jour. Rangeland Science, 2: 449-457. (In Persian).

Haenlein, G. F. W. and Ramirez, R. G., 2007. Potential mineral deficiencies on arid rangelands for small ruminants with special reference to Mexico, Small Ruminant Research, 68(1): 35-41.

Hosseini Kahnuj, S. H., Erfanzadeh, R. and Kamali, P., 2011. Evaluation of preference value and forage protein variations of plant species in Kahnuj rangelands of Kerman province. Pajohesh & Sazandagi, 91: 58-67. (In Persian).

Kerbs, C. J., 2001. Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Fifth ed. Addison Wesley Longman, Melo Park, California, USA.

Mesdaghi, M., 2002. Plant ecology. Mashhad University Press.187pp. (In Persian).

Migongo-Bake, W. and Hansen, R. M., 1987. Seasonal diets of camels, cattle, sheep, and goats in a common range in Eastern Africa, Range Management, 40: 76-79.

Raoufi Rad, V., Ebrahimi, A., Arzani, H. and Shojaie Asadiyeh, Z., 2013. Investigation on relationship between palatability and forage quality in some of rangeland plants (Case study: Karsanak rangelands of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province). Range and Watershed Management, 66(1): 111-120. (In Persian).

Rogosica, J.,  Pfisterb, J. A., Provenzac, F. D. and Grbesad, D., 2006. Sheep and goat preference for and nutritional value of Mediterranean maquis shrubs, Small Ruminant Research, 64: 169-179.

Sanadgol, A. A., 2005. Vegetative and productive characteristics of plants and livestock grazing in the pastures Saveh Rode Shor. Proceedings of Conference on Rangeland management in arid areas of forests and rangelands, 48-34. (In Persian).

Sanon, H. O., Kabore-Zoungrana, C. and Ledin, I., 2007. Behavior of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area, Small Ruminant Research, 67(1): 64-74.

Schwartz, C. C. and Ellis, J. E., 1981. Feeding ecology and niche separation in some native and domestic ungulates on the short grass prairie, Applied Ecology, 18: 343-353.

Vallentine, J. F., 2001. Grazing management. 2ed Edition, Academic Press, San Diego.

Yaynesheta, T.,  Eika, L. O. and  Moec, S. R., 2008. Influences of fallow age and season on the foraging behavior and diet selection pattern of goats (Capra hircus L.), Small Ruminant Research, 77: 25-37.

Journal of Rangeland Science

Volume 4, Issue 3
Summer 2014
Pages 195-202

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics