Application of Ecological Theory to Management of Arid Drylands: An Example from China

Document Type : Research and Full Length Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural and Natural Resources Sciences, P. O. Box 386, Gorgan,

2 Dryland Management Consultant, P.O. Box 31 Magill 5072.

Abstract

Rangeland ecosystems shift across dynamic thresholds between different
ecological states in response to natural or human-induced factors. These different
ecological states are the result of interactions among climate, soils, grazing history,
and management practices. The notion of a single ‘‘pristine’’ final state is only
conceptual in nature, and because of this, dynamic thresholds and the effects of
various processes on ecosystem structure and function must be incorporated into
decision-making. Rangeland managers should have a working knowledge of the
key ecological processes in each state, and the processes that drive a system across
a dynamic threshold from one state to another. To do this they need indicators for
critical decision-making points. It is essential to identify the thresholds of an
ecological transition state and ecological indicators of these states. The criteria of
these ecological indicators might be measurable, sensitive to stress on the system,
have a known response to disturbance and easy to measure. The state and transition
approach may offer an appropriate framework as an aid for decision making and
can be used to highlight ‘‘management windows’’ where opportunities can be
seized and hazards avoided. China’s vast drylands are used as a case study and the
potential to apply these principles is discussed.

Keywords


Anand, M. and Li, B.L. 2001.
Spatiotemporal dynamics in a transition
zone: patchiness, scale, and an emergent
property. Community Ecology, 2(2):
161-169.
Andreasen, J.K., O’Neill, R.V., Noss, R.
and Slosser, N.C. 2001. Considerations
for the development of a terrestrial index
of ecological integrity. Ecological
Indicators, 1: 21-35.
Behnke, R. Scoones, I and Kerven,C. (eds.)
Range Ecology at Disequilibrium: New
Models of Natural Variability and
Pastoral Adaptation in African Savannas.
Overseas Development Institute, London.
Dale, V.H, and Beyeler, S.C. 2001.
Challenges in the development and use
of ecological indicators. Ecological
Indicators, 1: 3-10.
Eiswerth, M.E. and Haney, J.C. 2001.
Maximizing conserved biodiversity: why
ecosystem indicators and thresholds
matter. Ecological Economics, 38: 259-
274.
Friedel, M.H. 1991. Range condition
assessment and the concept of threshold:
A viewpoint. J. Range Manage. 44: 422-
426.
Grainger, A 1992. Characterization and
assessment of desertification. In: G.P.
Chapman (ed.) Desertified Grasslands:
Their Biology and Management.
London: Academic Press, pp.17-33.
Herrmann, S.M and Hutchinson. C.F.
2005, The changing context of the
desertification debate. J. of Arid
Environments (in press)
Heshmati G.A., Conran J.G., Facelli J.M.
and Squires V.R. 1998 Vegetation
indicators of incipient change in
Chenopod arid Shrublands-A case study
for grazing management. In: Samira A.S.
Omar, Rafat Al-Ajmi and Nader AlAwadhi (eds.). Sustainable Development
in Arid Zones, Volume 2: Management
of Desert Resources, A.A. Balkema,
Rotterdam.
Humphrey, Caroline and David Sneath.
1999. The End of Nomadism?. Society,
State and the Environment in Inner Asia.
Duke University Press, Durham.
Ludwig, J. Tongway, D.G., Freudenberger,
D., Noble, J.C. and Hodgkinson, K.C.
1997. Landscape Ecology, function and
management principles from Australia’s
rangelands. CSIRO Publishing,
Collingwood.
Miller, D. 1998. Grassland privatization
and future challenges in the Tibetan 
Journal of Rangeland Science, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 2 G.A. Heshmati, et al. / 119
Plateau of Western China. pp. 106-122,
In: Jian Liu and Qi Lu (eds.) Proceedings
of the International Workshop on
Grassland Management and Livestock
Production in China, Reports of the
Sustainable Agricultural Working Group,
China Council on International
Cooperation on Environment and
Development (CCICED) March 28-29,
1998, Beijing, China. China
Environmental Science Press, Beijing.
NRC (National Research Council) 1994.
Rangeland health: new methods to
classify, inventory, and monitor
rangelands. National Academy Press,
Washington, D.C.
Sheehy, Dennis. 1998. How to deal with
the environmental degradation of
Northern Chinese grassland, pp. 67-82.
In: Jian Liu and Qi Lu (eds.). Grassland
Management and Livestock Production
in China, Reports of the Sustainable
Agriculture Working Group, China
Council for International Cooperation on
Environment and Development. China
Environment Science Press, Beijing.
Squires,V.R. and Andrew, M.H. 1998.
Management interventions: Are they
feasible in arid zone livestock production
systems? Annals of Arid Zone 37(3):
205-214.
Tongway, D. 1995. Monitoring soil
productive potential. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment, 37: 303-
318.
Tongway, D. and Hindley, N. 2000.
Assessing and monitoring desertification
with soil indicators. In: Rangeland
Desertification. Eds, Olafur Arnalds and
Steve Archer. Kluwer Academic,
Dordrecht.
West, N.E. and Yorks, T.P. 2002.
Vegetation responses following wildfire
on grazed and ungrazed sagebrush semidesert. J. Range Manage. 55: 171-181.
Westoby, M. Walker, B. and Noy-Meir, I.
1989. Opportunistic management for
rangelands not at equilibrium. J. Range
Manage. 42: 266-274.
Williams, Dee M.1996. The barbed walls
of China: A contemporary grassland
drama. The J. of Asian Studies, 55(3):
665-691.
Williams, Dee M. 1996. Grassland
enclosures: Catalyst of land degradation
in Inner Mongolia. Human Organization,
55(3): 307-313.
Williams, M.A J. and R. C. Balling. 1995.
Interactions of Desertification and
Climate. WMO.UNEP.