Changes in Soil Properties by Harvester Ant's Activity (Messor spp.) in Roodshoor Steppe Rangeland of Saveh, Iran

Document Type : Research and Full Length Article


1 Msc. of Rangeland Management, Islamic Azad University, Nour Branch, Mazandaran, Iran

2 Faculty Member, Department of Rangeland Management, Islamic Azad University, Nour Branch,

3 Research Associate, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York


One of the most important micro engineers of the terrestrial ecosystems, especially in the arid areas is the harvester ants due to their activity in the soil through nest building; they can make major changes while influencing the surface and subsurface in the rangeland soil. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of harvester ants (Messor spp.) on some soil properties in Roodshoor Steppe rangeland in Saveh, Iran. Soil samples in four depths (0-10, 10-20, 20-30, and 30-40 cm) were taken in three treatments of active and non-active nests and control area. Soil infiltration test was carried out over ants' nest and control site in dry and wet seasons by double rings method. The results showed that the Messor spp. soils had lower pH and higher concentration of organic matter, total carbon, N, P, K, Mg+2, Ca+2, Ec and sand percent in comparison with the control site. The soil infiltration rate regarding the nests was significantly higher than the control area in both dry and wet seasons. In the same habitat, nutrient concentrations did not change along the vertical gradient in contrast to control plots where soil nutrients decreased with depth. This showed homogeneity of different soil layers by ants. On the other hand, investigating the chemical and physical properties of soil did not show a significant difference between the dead nests and the control area. This can be the expression of effects created as the result of the presence of ants in modifying soil in the active nests. These effects disappeared with the passage of time after they left their nests. Therefore, the role of the ants in changing soil properties should be considered, especially in the arid and semi-arid area in which the soil is poor. The presence of ant colonies and their activity in this climate can improve soil conditions and increase soil fertility in most parts of the ground.


Main Subjects

Anderson, A. N., Morrison, S.C., 1998. Myrmecochory in Australia's seasonal tropics-effects of disturbance on distance dispersal. Ecology.5: 483-491.
Boulton, A. M., Jofee, B. A., Scow, K. M., 2003. Effects of a common Harvester Ant (Messor andrci) on richness & abundance of soil biota. Applied soil Ecology. 23: 257-265.
Bastin, G.N., Ludwig, J.A. Eager, R.W., Chewinys, V.H., Liedloff, A.C., 2002.Indicators of landscape function comparing patchiness metrics using remotely-sensed data from rangelands. Ecological indicators. 1: 247-260.
Baraibar, B., Torraa. l., Westerman, P.R., 2011. Harvester ant (Messor barbarus) density as related to soil properties, topography and management in semi-arid cereals. Applied Soil Ecology. 51: 60– 65
Bestelmeyer, B.T, Wiens, J.A., 2003. Scavenging Ant foraging behavior and variation in the scale of nutrient redistribution among semi-arid grasslands. Jour. Arid Environments. 53: 373-386.
Bremner, J. M., and Mulvaney, C. S., 1982. Nitrogen total. P. 595-624. In Page, A. L. (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Agron. No. 9, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI, USA.
Brown, G., Scherberb, C., Ramos Jr, P., Ebrahimde, E., 2012. The effects of harvester ant (Messor ebeninus Forel) nests on vegetation and soil properties in a desert dwarf shrub community in north-eastern Arabia. Flora. 207: 503-511.
Cammerat, L. H., Willott, S. J., Compton, S. G. & Incoll, L. D., 2002. The effects of ant's nests on the physical, chemical & hydrological properties of a rangeland soil in semi-arid Spain. Geoderma. 105: 1-20.
Carol Nicolai, N., 2005. Plant community dynamics governed by red harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex Barbatus) activities and their role as drought refuge in a semi-arid Savanna, Texas A&M University. PhD Theses.
Crawford, C.S., 1981. Biology of desert invertebrates. Springer. Berlin. 300pp.
Dahms, H., Lenoir, L., Lindborg, R., Wolters, V. & Douber, J., 2010. Restoration of semi natural grassland: what is the impact on ants? Restoration Ecology. 18:330-337.
Dostal., P., Breznova, M. Kozl─▒,Vladim─▒ra, Kova, Herben,T., Kova, P., 2005. Ant-induced soil modification and its effect on plant below ground biomass. Pedobiologia 49: 127-137.
Eldrige, D.J., 1994. Nests of Ants and termites influence infiltration in a semi-arid woodland. Pedobiologia 38: 481-492.
Folgarait, P., 1998. Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodiversity Conservation. 7: 1221-1244.
Ghobadi, M., Agosti, D., Mahdavi, M., Jouri, M. H.,  2015. Effects of harvester ant nest activity (Messor spp.) on structure and function of plant community in a steppe rangeland (Case Study: Roodshoor, Saveh, Iran). Jour. Rangeland Science, 5: 269-283.
Graham, J., 2009. Species richness, equitability and abundance of ants in disturbed landscape. Ecological Indicators. 9: 866-877.
Ginzburg, Orit W.G. & Steinberger, W., 2008. Effects of harvester ant (Messor spp.) activity on soil properties and microbial communities in a Negev desert ecosystem. Bio Fertile Soils. 45: 165-173
Herrick, J, E., Whitford, W.G., Desoyza, A.G., Vanzee, J.W., Hastad, K. M., Seybold. C.A., Walton, M., 2001. Field soil aggregate stability kit for soil quality & rangeland health evaluations. Catena. 44: 27-35
Jemes, A., Eldridge, D., Koen, T.B. & Whitford, W.G., 2008. Landscape position moderates how ant nests effect hydrology and soil chemistry across a Chihuahun desert watershed. Landscape Ecol. 23: 961-975.
Jikova,V., Maejicek, L., & Frouz, J., 2011. Changes in the pH and other soil chemical parameters in soil surrounding wood ant (Formica polyctena) nests. Soil biology 47: 72-76.
Jacob, H. and Clarke, G., 2002. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Method, Soil Science Society of America, Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1692 p.
Johnson, R.A., 1998. Foundress survival and brood production in the desert seed-harvester ants Pogonomyrmex rugosus  and P. barbatus (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 45: 255–266.
Lafleur, B., Hooperbui, L. M., Mumma, P., & Geaghan, J.P., 2005. Soil fertility & plant growth in soil from pine forests & plantations: effect of invasive red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta). Pedobiologia. 49: 415- 423.
Lanyon, L.E., and Heald, W.R., 1982. Magnesium,Calcium,Strontium and Barium. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Page, A.L., Miller R.H., Keeney D.R. (Eds). Agronomy No. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison WI, 247-262 pp.
Lei, S.A., 2000. Ecological impacts of seed harvester ants on soil attributes in a Larrea-dominated shrubland. WN Am Nat. 60: 439-444.
Lobryde Bruyn, L. A. and Conacher, A. J., 1990. The role of termites & ants in soil modification: a review. Soil Res. 28: 55-93
Lobryde Bruyn, L. A., Conacher, A. J., 1994. The bioturbation activity of ants in agricultural and naturally vegetated habitats in semi-arid environments. Aust. Soil. Res. 32: 555-570.
Machmahon, J. A, Mull, J. F., Crist, T. O. 2000. Harvester Ants (Pogonomyrmex Spp) their community and ecosystem influences. Annual review ecology systematic. 31:265-291.
Mahdavi, M., Arzani, H & Jouri, M. H., 2009. Analysis of rangeland conditions changes using of qualitative method of rangeland health. Rangeland. 3: 397-411. (In Persian).
Mahdavi, M. & Ghobadi, M., 2014. Persian translation of Ants book: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Jahad Daneshgahi publishing. 528pp., Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
McLean, E.O., 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In Methods of soil analysis, part 2, In Page, A. L. (ed.), Madison, Wisconsin. ASA-SSSA.
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E., 1982. Total carbon and organic matter. In Methods of soil analysis, part 2, in Page, A. L. (ed.), Madison, Wisc. ASA-SSSA.
Olsen, S.R., and Sommers, L. E., 1982. Phosphorus. P.403- 430. In A.L. Page, Miller. R.H. (Eds).), Methods of soil analysis, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI, USA.
Rezaei, S. A., Arzani, H., Tongway, D., 2006. Assessing rangeland capability in Iran using landscape function indices based on soil surface attributes. Arid Environments. 65: 460-473.
Richards, P., 2009. Aphaenogaster ants as bioturbators: impact on soil & slope process. Earth-science. 96: 92-106.
Robinson, E.J., Holcombet, M. & Ratnieks, F., 2008. The organization of soil disposal by ants. Animal Behavior. 75:1389-1399.
Snyder. S. R., Crist, T.O., Friese, C.F., 2002.Variability in soil chemistry and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in harvester ant nests: the influence of topography, grazing and region. Biol Fertil Soil,  35: 406-413.
Sepahvand, A. Taie Semiromi M., Mirnia S.K. & Moradi H.R., 2011.Assessing the Sensitivity of Infiltration Models to Variability of Soil Moisture. Jour. Water Soil. 25: 338-346. (In Persian).
Underwooda, E., Fisher, B.L., 2006. The role of ants in conservation monitoring: If, when, and how? Biological Conservation 132(2): 166-182.
Wagner, D., Brown, J. F., Gordon, D.M., 1997. Harvester ant nests, soil biota and soil chemistry. Oecologia. 112: 232-236.
Wagner, D., Jones, J. & Gordon, J., 2004. Development of harvester ant colonies alters soil chemistry. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 36: 797-804.
Wang, D., Lowery, B., Norman, J.M., & Mesweeny, K., 1996. Ant burrow effects on water flow and soil hydraulic properties of Sparta sand. Soil Tillage Res.37:83-93.
Water & soil adviser managers of Tehran province. 1997. Water infiltration in soil. Infilt software. (In Persian)
Whitford, W.G., Barness, G. & Steinberger,Y., 2007. Effects of three species of Chihuahuan desert ants on annual plants and soil properties. Arid Environments.72: 392-400.
Wu, H., Lu, X., Wu, D., Yin, X., 2010. Biogenic structures of two ant species Formica sanguinea and Lasius flavus altered soil C, N and P distribution in a meadow wetland of the Sanjiang Plain, China. Applied Soil Ecology. 46: 321–328.