Analysis of Feed Carrying Capacity for Ruminant Livestock in Madura Island, Indonesia

Document Type : Review and Short Length Article


1 Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Brawijaya University, Jalan Veteran Malang 65145, East Java, Indonesia.

2 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Brawijaya University, Jalan Veteran Malang 65145, East Java, Indonesia.


A region is considered self-sustainable when the feed provision is adequate for all livestock demands. Livestock is fed in order to supply nutrient needs for maintenance, growth, and reproduction purposes. This study aimed to determine whether Madura Island inIndonesia is able to independently provide sufficient forage for its ruminant livestock. A Carrying Capacity Index (CCI) in four regions of Madura Island was determined and then, the capacity to sustain additional ruminant livestock was calculated. The results showed that Sumenep and Pamekasan with average values of 454306 and 90663 BKC had the highest and lowest potentials for the supply of fresh forage, respectively. Sumenep also had the best carrying capacity of all the analyzed regions, supporting up to 231879 ST ruminants. Also, the results suggest that Madura Island was already at overcapacity with the livestock population that exceeds the region’s capability to provide feed from fresh or waste agricultural products. 


Main Subjects

Ashari, E. J., Sumanto, B. W., Suratman, Dwiyanto, K., 1996. Buku Pedoman Analisis Potensi Wilayah Penyebaran dan Pengembangan "The Analysis Guidelines of The Livestock Spread Area Potency and Development". Bogor: Livestock Research Association, Indonesia.
Bergman, M. A., Richert, R. M., Cicconi, K. M., Gamroth, M. J., 2014. Schukkent Ynagement practices used to assess welfare of calves and adult dairy cows on organic and conventional dairy farms. Journal Dairy Science, 97: 4269-4280.
Gado, H.M., Elghandour, M. M. Y., Cipriano, M., Odongo, N. E., Salem, A. Z. M., 2017. Rumen degradation and nutritive utilization of wheat straw, corn stalks and sugarcane bagasse ensiled with multienzymes. Journal Applied Animal Research, 45: 485-489.
Hammond, K. J., Humphries, D. J., Westbury, D. B., Thompson, A., Crompton, L. A., Kirton, P., Gree,  C., Reynolds, C.K., 2014. The inclusion of forage mixtures in the diet of growing dairy heifers: Impacts on digestion, energy utilisation, and methane emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 197: 88-95.
Nampanzira, D. K., Kabasa, J. D., Nalule, S. A., Nakalembe, I., Tabuti, J.R., 2015. Characterization of the goat feeding system among rural small holder farmers in the semi-arid regions of Uganda. Springerplus, 4: 188-196.
Scasta, J. D., David, L. L., Leticia, H., 2016. Drought Mitigation for Grazing Operations: Matching the Animal to the Environment. Rangeland, 38: 204-210.
Yanti, Y., Yayota, M., 2017. The Use of Agricultural Waste as Ruminants Feed. Review Agriculture Science, 5: 65-76.
Beigh, Y.A., Ganai, A.M, Ahmad, A.A., 2017. Prospects of complete feed system in ruminant feeding: A review. Veterany world, 10: 424-437.
Volume 9, Issue 3
July 2019
Pages 313-318
  • Receive Date: 28 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 21 October 2018
  • Accept Date: 28 October 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 July 2019