Determination and Comparison of Preference Value for Five Halophyte Species in the Marginal Rangeland of Salt Lake in Aran and Bidgol Region, Kshan, Iran

Document Type : Research and Full Length Article


Assistant Professor, Department of Watershed &Rangeland Management University of Kashan


Since the halophytes species have an important role in such ecosystem balance and they have been grazed by livestock as supplementary forage, the awareness of livestock's desire to grazing and their preference values of these species is of high priority. Regardless of the importance of halophyte species in the livestock feeding in Iran, there is less published research on the livestock grazing from these species. In present study, the preference value of the five halophyte species (Seidlitzia rosmarinus, Salsola crassa, Aeluropus littoralis, Suada fruticosa and Anabasis setifera) was determined using preference index and timing methods in the marginal rangelands of Aran and Bidgol salt lake, Kashan, Iran in 2013-2016 during the grazing season. The preference values of these halophytes spices were assessed using Whittaker and Niering method. In the timing method, the animal grazing for 20 minutes was filmed for 1 to 2 hours after the flock arrival to the rangeland, and the grazing time of each species was recorded. According to the results of the analysis of variance, the species effect was significant for both grazing time and preference index (p<0.01). The results of the mean comparison showed that the Aeluropus littoralis with average values of 0.636 and 10.1 had a higher preference index and grazing time by livestock than that for other halophyte species, respectively. Also, in terms of livestock behavior for both factors, the highest grazing time was observed in October followed by November. The results of the species by grazing season interaction effect showed that the Salsola crassa and Aeluropus littoralis had higher preference indices for grazing whereas Seidlitzia rosmarinus and Aeluropus littoralis had longer times of grazing. According to the results of this research, the timing method was introduced as an appropriate method to determine the preference values of halophyte species in the studied area.


Abdelsalam, M.I., Abdalla, N.I., Abdelkreim, M., Ibrahim, M.E., and Mohammed, M.M., 2017. The impact of continuous grazing on natural rangeland in Alazzazah area- Blue Nile State, Sudan. Journal of Rangeland Science, 7(4): 309-315.
Abdollahi, V., Dianati Tilaki G.A. Farzadmehr J., and Sohrabi, h., 2009. Relative palatability of plant species for camel in southwest of Birjand desert area, Journal of Rangeland, 3(3): 28-443. (In Persian).
ACSAD (Arab Center for the Study of Arid Zones and Dry lands). 1979. Arab and Middle East tables of feed composition. Damascus, Syria: ACSAD and International Feedstuffs Institute.
Ahmadi, A., Sanadgol, A., Saravi, M., Arzani, H., and Zahedi, G. 2009. Investigation of grazing behavior and diet selection by Zandi sheep) case study: desert rangelands of Houze Sultan, Qom), Journal of Rangeland, 3(2): 232-245. (In Persian).
Allison, C.D., 1985. Factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants: A review. Journal of Rangeland Management, 38(4): 305-311.
Aregheore,  E.M., Ofori, B., and Rere, S., 2006. Studies on grazing behavior of goats in the cook Islands: The animal plant complex in forage preference/palatability phenomena, International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 15(3): 160–175.
Askarizadeh, D., and Arzani, H. 2018. ecological effects of climate factors on rangeland vegetation (case study: Polour rangelands), Journal of Rangeland Science 8(4): 330-340.
Arzani, H., 2009. Forage quality and daily requirement for livestock grazing on pasture. University of Tehran, Iran, 354p.
Arzani, H., Nikkhah, A., Arzani, Z., Kaboli, S.H., and Fazel Dehkordi, L., 2006. Study of Range Forage Quality in three provinces of Semnan Markazi and Lorestan for calculation of animal unit requirement. Journal of Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 76:60-68. (In Persian).
Baumont, R., Prache, S., Meorent, M., and Morand-Fehr, P., 2000. How forage characteristics influence behavior and intake in small ruminants: A review. Journal of Livestock Production Science 64: 15-28.
Bown, D., 2016. Encyclopedia of herbs and their uses. London, UK: Dorling Kindersley. 450p.
El-Shaer, H.M. 2018. Halophytes and salt-tolerant plants as potential forage for ruminants in the Near East region, Journal of Small Ruminant Research, 91: 3-12.
Habibian, S.M., Arzani. H., Javadi, S.A., and Habibian, S.H., 2010. Comparison of two methods of preference value determination of plant species for sheep in semi-steppe rangelands in Fars province. Iranian journal of rangeland, 49(2): 188-197.
Heady, H. F., 1984. Concepts and principle underlying grazing systems. West view press. USA, 885-902.
Holechek, J.L., Vavra, M., and Pieper, R.D., 1984. Methods for determine the botanical composition, similarity and overlap of range herbivore diets. In: developing strategies for rangeland management. Eds. national research council, national academy of sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 425-471.
Hussain, F., and Durrani, M.J., 2009. Seasonal availability, palatability and animal preferences of forage plant in Harboi Arid Rangeland, Kalat, Pakistan. Pak. Journal of Botany, 41(2): 539-554.
Isfahan Meteorological Organization, 2017. Annual report of Meteorology, 2: 258 p.
Malechek, J.C., and Provenza, F.D., 1981. Feeding behavior and nutrition of goats on rangelands. In: proceedings of the international, Nutrition and System of Goats Feeding Conferences, 20-22 September, Argentina, 411-428.
Malechek, J.C., 2013. Impacts of grazing intensity and specialized grazing systems on livestock response. In: developing strategies for rangeland management, Journal of Rangeland Ecology, 20:1129-1158.
 Miftakhova, A.F., Burasheva, G.S., Abilov, Z.A., Ahmad, V.U. and Zahid, M., 2018. Coumarins from aerial part of Halocnemum strobilaceum. Journal of Fitoterapia, 72(3): 319-321.
Miller, D.F., 2015. Composition of cereal grains and forages. National Research Council Publication Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of Sciences. 585p.
Mirdavoodi, H.R., Sanadgol, A.A., 2008. Study of preference value of range plant in key ranges of Anjedan,s rangelands of Markazi province. Iranian journal of Range and Desert Research, 16(2): 45-58. (In Persian).
Nedjimi, B., 2017a. Salt tolerance strategies of Lygeum spartum L.: A new fodder Crop for Algerian saline steppes, Journal of Flora, 204(10): 747-754.
Nedjimi, B., 2017b. Seasonal Variation in Productivity, Water Relations and Ion Contents of Atriplex and halimus subsp and Seidlitzia rosmarinus Grown in Chott Zehrez Wetland, Algeria, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 11: 43-49.
Ngwa, A.T., Pone, D.K., and Mafeni, J.M. 2000. Feed selection and diet preference of forage by small ruminants grazing natural pastures in the sahelian zone of Cameroon. Journal of Animal Feed selection and Technology 88: 253-266.
Okhovvat, M.S., 1999. Preference value of halophyte range plants in Middle East, final report of research plan, natural resources research centre of Dubai province, AIS, Egypt, 450 pp.
Phayaz, M., Nateghi, S., Yeganeh, H., Mirhagi, T., Habibian, S.H., and Mosavi, S.A., 2011. Determining of preference value of Bromus tomentellus by two time consumption and preference, Journal of Range and Water Management, 6(2): 36-42.
Provenza, F.D., and Balph, D.F., 2013. Diet learning by domestic ruminants: theory, evidence and practical implications. Journal of Applied Animal Behave Science 18: 211-232.
Rashtian, A., Mesdaghi, M., Boldaji, F., Barani, H., 2008. Investigation of preference value of seven Rangelands species in the Yazd rangelands. Iranian Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources Science, 16(3): 56-62 (In Persian).
Rogosic, J., Pfister, J.A., Provenza, F.D., and Grbesa, D., 2006, Sheep and goat preference for and nutritional value of Mediterranean maquis shrubs, Journal of Small Ruminant Research 64: 169–179.
Rohban, R., Amoozegar, M.A., and Ventosa, A., 2009. Screening and isolation of halophilic bacteria producing extracellular hydrolyses from Howz Soltan Lake, Iran. Journal of Ind. Microbiology and Biotechnology. 36: 333-340.
Sanadgol, A.A., 2011. Effect of Grazing system and stocking rate on soil, plant and animal in Bromus tomentellus pasture. Journal of Natural Resources, 11: 34-45.
Sanon, H.O., Kabor, C., Zoungrana, B., and Ledin, I., 2011. Behavior of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area, Journal of Small Ruminant Research, 67: 64-74.
Senft, R.L., 1989. Effect of stocking and landscape composition on simulated resources use by animals. Journal of Ecological Modeling, 46: 283-303.
Springfield, H.W., and Reynolds, H.G., 2016. Grazing preferences of cattle for certain reseeding grasses, Journal of Rangeland Management, 4(2): 83-87.
Stoddart, L.A., Smith, A.D., Box, T.W., 1975. Range Management McGrow-Hill, New York, USA, 532pp.
Vallentine, J.F., 1990. Grazing Management. Academic press, San Diego, CA, 533pp.
Whittaker, R.H., and Niering, W.A., 2009. Vegetation Biomass, production and diversity along an elevation gradient of Santa Catalina Mountain, Arizona. Journal of Ecology, 56: 771-790.
Volume 10, Issue 1
January 2020
Pages 112-124
  • Receive Date: 30 January 2019
  • Revise Date: 04 January 2020
  • Accept Date: 21 January 2020
  • First Publish Date: 21 January 2020