Forage Quality of Salsola turcomanica (Litv) in Semi-arid Region of Gomishan, Golestan Province, Iran

Document Type : Research and Full Length Article


1 Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V. Müncheberg, Germany

2 Department of Rangeland Management, College of Rangeland and Watershed Managemet, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Leibniz Center for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Germany

4 Leibniz Center for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalde university of applied science. Germany.

5 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Eberswalder Straße 84 15374 Müncheberg​


The information about the forage quality of rangeland species is essential to supply a reasonable diet to livestock and determine thestocking rate and grazing time on rangelands. Salsola turcomanica is one of the important species of semi-arid rangelands in the Western part of Golestan province, Iran. The present study was conducted to provide information about the nutritive value of S.turcomanica at different growth stages in 2019. Plant samples (with three replications) were randomly collected in four growth stages (vegetative stage, early flowering, late flowering and seed maturity) from Gomishan rangelands during the summer and autumn 2019. Seven quality indices, including Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Crude Protein (CP), Dry Matter Digestibility (DMD), Metabolizable Energy (ME), Digestible Energy (DE), Total Digestible Nutrient (TDN) and Ash content (Ash) were analyzed. Data analysis was performed using One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) method and mean comparisons were done by Duncan test. The results demonstrated that there are significant differences among phenological stages for all the traits (p <0.05). The results demonstrated that the content of CP (from 25.66% to 8.33%), DMD (from 84.45% to 56.31%), ME (from 12.35 to 7.57 MJ/Kg), Ash (from 40.03% to 35.60 %), DE (from 36.17 to 24.12 Mcal/Kg) and TDN (from 82.55% to 53.41%) were decreased by the progress of growth stages. Regarding its growth seasons and high values of CP, ME and DMD in all phenological stages, it is suggested that this species can have aprominent place in the grazing livestock diet in semi-arid rangelands.


Abarsaji, G., Mahdavi, M., Jouri, M.H. 2010. Determination of Concentration of Sodium Chloride under Grazing and Exclosure in Saline and Alkaline Rangelands of Golestan Province (Case Study: Inchehboroun Saline Rangelands). Journal of Natural Ecosystems of Iran. 4: 9-15 (In Persian).
Ahmadi, A., Gomarian, M., Sanjari, M. 2013. Variations in Forage Quality of Two Halophyte Species, Camphorosma monspeliaca and Limonium iranicum at Three Phenological Stages, Journal of Rangeland Science, 3 (3): 245-251.
Ahmadi- Beni, A., Niknahad Gharmakher, H., Sadat Azimi, M., Gholi, Maramaei, M. 2014. Investigation of forage quality of Vetiveria zizanioides in semi-steppe region of Maravehtappeh, Golestan Province, Iran, Journal of Rangeland Science, 4(4): 287-297.
Akbarinia, A., and Koocheki, A. 1992. Investigation on effects of different harvesting stages on growth, productivity and quality of some barley's varieties. Journal of Pejouhesh and Sazandegi 15:40–43.
AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1980. Official Methods of Analysis. 13th edn. AOAC, Washington, DC.
Arzani, H., 1994. Some aspects of estimating short term and long-term rangeland carrying capacity in the Western Division of New South Wales, Ph.D. Thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Arzani, H., Ghasemi Arian, N., Moetamedi, J., Filekesh, E. and Moammeri, M., 2013. Investigation of forage quality index of some range species and comparison with their critical levels for daily requirement of grazing animal in estepi rangelands of Sabzevar. Arid Biome Scientific and Research Journal, 3(1): 13-21.
Arzani, H., Motamedi (Torkan), J., Jafari, M., Farahpoor, M. and Zare Chahoki, M. A., 2013. Classification of forage quality index in highland rangelands of Taleghan. Iranian Jour. Range and Desert Research, 20(2): 250-271. (In Persian).
Arzani, H., Ahmadi, Z., Azarnivand, H. and Bihamta M.R. 2010. Forage quality of three life forms of rangeland species in semi-arid and semi-humid regions in different phenological stages. Desert. 15: 71-74.
Arzani, H., Zohdi, M., Fish, E., Zahedi Amiri, G. H., Nikkhah, A. and Wester, D., 2004. Phenological effects on forage quality of five grass species. Jour. Range Management, 57:624-629. (In Persian).
Arzani, H., Torkan, J., Jafari, M., and Nikkhah, A. 2001. Investigation on effects of phenological stages and environmental factors (soil and climate) on forage quality of some important range species. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 32:385–397.
Asaadi, A. M. and Khoshnood Yazdi, A., 2011. Phenological stage effects on forage quality of four forbs species. Jour. Food, Agriculture & Environment, 9 (2): 380-384.
Ashrafzadeh, M., Niknahad-Gharmakher, H., Saharkhiz, M.J., Ghorbani-Nahoji, M. Heshmati, Gh., 2019. Breaking seed dormancy of Clematis ispahanica and its optimum planting depth and density (Case study: Bavanat, Fars province). Journal of Range and Desert Research, 26 (3): 629-639. (In Persian).
Azarnivand, H., Joneidi, H., Jarari, M. and Nikou, S., 2006. The study of Forage Quality of Smirnovia iranica in different phenological stages in sandy areas-case-study: Band-e-Rig-Kashan. Desert Jour., 11(2):1-10. (In Persian).
Bakhshi- Khaniki, G.H., Maroof, E. 2006. Karyotypic study of some species of the genus salsola L. (chenopodiaceae) in Golestan province. Journal of Pajouhesh- va- Sazandegi,72: 66-72. (In Persian).
Ball, D. M., Collins, M., Lacefield, G. D., Martin, N. P., Mertens, D. A., Olson, K. E., Putnam, D. H., Undersander, D. J. and Wolf, M. W., 2001. Understanding Forage Quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01, Park Ridge, IL.
Behnamfar, K., Siadat, S. A. and Salehe, M. H., 2009. Comparison of nutritional values of important range species in semi warm steppe rangeland of Khouzestan. Iranian Jour. Range and Desert Research, 16(1):86-95. (In Persian).
Boufennara, S., Lopez, S., Bousseboua, H., Bodas, R., and Bouazza, L. 2012. Chemical composition and digestibility of some browse plant species collected from Algerian arid rangelands. Span. J. Agric. Res., 10(1): 88-98.
Caballero, R., Alzueta, C., Ortiz, L. Rodriguez, M., Barro, C., Rebole, A. 2001. Carbohydrate and protein fractions of fresh and dried common vetch at three maturity stages. Agron. J., 93 (5): 1006-1013.      
Daalkhaijav, D., and Daltanzul, T.S., 2000. Chemical content and rumen degradability of desert steppe pasture, Research institute of animal husbandry, Zaisan, Ulaanbaator 10153. PP: 1-7.
Fonnesbeck, P.V., Clark, D.H., Garret, W.N., and Speth, C.F. 1984. Predicting energy utilization from alfalfa hay from the Western Region. Proc. Am. Anim. Sci. (Western Section) 35: 305-308.
Ghadaki, M. B., Vansoest, P. J., Mcdowel, R. C. and Malekpour, B., 1974. Composition and in vitro digestibility of some arid zone forage from Iran. 12th International Grassland Congress. Moscow. Russia, 3(1): 542-549.
Ghanbari, A. and Sahraei, M., 2012. Determination of nutritional value in three forage species in three phenological stages in Sabalan Rangelands, Ardebil, Iran. Jour. Rangeland Science, 2(2): 449– 457.
Gintzburger G, Toderich KN, Mardonov BK, Mahmudov MM. 2003. Rangelands of the arid and semi -arid zones in Uzbekistan. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). ISBN ICARDA 92-91 27-137-8. PP:434.
Givens, D.I., Everincton,  J.M., and Aoamson, A.H. 1990. The nutritive value of spring grown herbage produced on farms throughout England and Wales over four years. II. The prediction of apparent digestibility in vivo from various laboratory measurements. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 27. 173-184.
Goorchi, T., 1995. Determination of chemical composition and dry matter digestibility of dominante species in Isfahan Province, M.Sc. Thesis. Industrial University of Isfahan, Iran. (In Persian).
Harrocks, D. and Valentine, J. F., 1999. Harvested forage. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hanif, Z., Ali, H.H., Rasool, G., Tanveer, A. and Chauhan, B.S., 2018. Genus Salsola: Its Benefits, Uses, Environmental Perspectives and Future Aspects- A Review. Journal of Rangeland Science, 8 (3):315 -328.
Holechek, J.L., Pieper, R.D., Herbel, C.H., 2005. Range management principles and practices, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, 587P.
Jafari, M. (1994) Salt tolerance of some rangeland grasses of Iran. Institute of Forests & Rangelands, pp 54-90. in Persian.
Kashki, M.T., Zandi Esfahan, E., Mohammadi, M., Ranjbar, M. 2016. Effects of growth stages on forage quality of specific halophytes (Limonium iranicum and Reaumuria fruticosa) in the Bajestan desert of Korasan province, Iran. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 5(3): 787-794.
Kazemi, M., Valizadeh, R., 2019. Nutritive value of some rangeland plants compared to Medicago sativaJournal of Rangeland Science 9, 136-150.
Linn, J. G. and Martin, N. P., 1999. Forage quality tests and interpretations. The college of Agriculture, food and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Extension service, USA.
Mcdonald, P., Edvards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Morgan, C. A., 1995. Animal Nutrition. 5th ed. Longman Scientific & Technical, New York, NY, 597 p.
Niknahad-Gharmakher, H., Jafari Foutami, I., Sharifi, A. 2015. Effects of grazing exclusion on plant productivity and carbon sequestration (Case study: Gomishan rangelands, Golestan province, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 5(2):122-134.
Niknahad-Gharmakher H, Sheidai-Karkaj E, Jafari,I. 2017. Effects of Exclosure on Soil Properties in Winter Rangelands in Golestan Province, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science 7(1): 55-66.
Oddy,V.H., Robards, G.E., and Low, S.G. 1983. Prediction of in vivo dry matter digestibility from the fiber and nitrogen content of a feed. Glenfield, New South Wales, Australia: Department of Agriculture, Nutrition and Feeds Evaluation Unit, Veterinary Research Station. p. 395–398.
Panahi, F., Assareh, M., Jafari, M., Jafari, A., Arzani, H., Tavili, A. and Zandi Esfahan, E., 2012. Phenological Effects on Forage Quality of Salsola arbuscula, Salsola orientalis and Salsola tomentosa in Three Habitats in the Central Part of Iran. Middle-East Jour. Scientific Research, 11 (6): 800-807.
Pasandi, M., Hosseini, M.A., Kavian, A. 2017. Forage quality of important halophytes in saline and alkaline rangelands of Golestan province at two phenological stages. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, Vol. 24 No. (3).
Pinkerton, B. 1996. Forage quality. Clemson, SC: Crop and Soil Environment Science Department, College of Agriculture, Forest, and Life Science, Clemson University. 998. p.
Prasad, M. N. V. 2008. Trace Elements as Contaminants and Nutrients: Consequences in Ecosystems and Human Health, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rayburn, E., 2002. Forage management. Sheep symposium, March, 2, 2002, Meadow Landspa.
Schuetz, M., Benske, A., Smith, R.A., Watanabe, Y., Tobimatsu, Y., Ralph, J., Demura, T., Ellis, B., Samuels, A.L. 2014. Laccases direct lignification in the discrete secondary cell wall domains of protoxylem. Plant Physiol. 166:798–807. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.245597.
Squires, V.R., Ayoub, A.T. 1994. Halophytes as a Resource for Livestock and for Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht Boston, London, 315 p.
Squires, V.R. 1981. Livestock management in the arid zone. Melbourne, Australia. Inkata press. 269 pp.
Standing Committee on Agriculture (SCA), 1990. Feeding standards for Australian livestock ruminants, CSIRO, Australian.
Torkan, J.1999. Effects of phonological Stages and Ecological Factors on Forage Quality of some Rang Species., MSc thesis. Thehran University.
Van Soest, P. J. (1994) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. 476 p.
Zare, M., Zandi-Esfahan, E., Ghorbani, A. 2019. Forage Quality of Salsola yazdiana and S. tomentosa in different Growth Stages in Saline Desert of Yazd Province, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science. 9 (2): 104-113.
Volume 11, Issue 1
January 2021
Pages 76-88
  • Receive Date: 16 March 2020
  • Revise Date: 14 July 2020
  • Accept Date: 25 July 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 January 2021